Internal and External Stakeholders Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Internal and External Stakeholders - Assignment Example ary funding to emergency management has negatively affected the effort by FEMA to design a properly functioning and integrated communication system that would bring majority, if not all, of the involved stakeholders on board. Since September 11, existing funding and staff resources have been redirected at Department of Homeland Security to focus significantly on terrorism based activities. According to the 2013 Federal Signal Public Safety Survey conducted by Zogby, three-quarters of emergency managers cited budget constraints as their biggest challenge when it comes to updating their emergency communication systems (Griffin, 2013). Citizens’ apathy towards public safety also contribute to the communication challenges. John Von Thaden, vice president and general manager, notification systems at Federal Signals, puts this challenge into perspective by highlighting the obstacles encountered by public safety official in their bid to implement ECS solutions. He notes that the general public continue to remain disinterested in efforts rolled out by emergency officials to raise their awareness and preparedness in the wake of a disaster. Undoubtedly, very few Americans are concerned of the emergency numbers that they ought to call in the event of an emergency. Public drills on emergence response are rarely taken serious by the citizens (Griffin, 2013). Also, technological advancement has ironically bolstered communication challenges in emergency management. This is by taking the citizens’ dimension. Facebook, twitter, and other social media platforms seem to be competing with conventional modes of communication such as radio, television, and phone calls. The varied preferences on the channel to use has made it hard for public safety officials to reach out to the maximum number of individuals in case of a disaster. A mobile platform should be embraced as the main medium of communication during emergencies. This is because physical infrastructure is often prone to

Litigation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Litigation - Term Paper Example Litigation is term used to refer to the process of filing, defending and standing in favor or against a particular case of law (Cheeseman 35). Before litigation is conducted, the case of the conflict experiences several processes including initial pleadings, judgments that take place before the trial, dismissal of the case and settlement of the case. Due to so many phases involved in the litigation process, organizations as well as individuals have to spend lump sum of finances and ample amount of time is wasted in solving the conflict. These proceedings even negatively impact the image of the parties involved in may cause disturbances in day to day running of the business. Due to these heavy risks associated with judicial proceedings, organizations tend to select alternative methods of solving disputes such as bargaining, arbitration as well as mediation (Cheeseman 43). There are several differences between the process of conflict resolution through judicial proceedings and ADR. In judicial proceedings, third parties are involved such as the jury to decide whether or not an individual is guilty and worthy of punishment. In case of certain methods of ADR, a third party is rarely involved and in certain methods third party involvement even takes place and the third party is a neutral representative and the party can only participate in facilitation of negotiation. For example in the case of Arbitration, a neutral third party gets involved and is regarded as the arbitrator and is selected by parties involved in the dispute and has the responsibility of listening to the case of both the parties and the decision taken by the arbitrator decides the outcome of the case. When the conciliation dispute settlement method is used, the parties involved do not negotiate with each other in a face to face manner. Due to this a conciliator who is mostly neutral in nature is used and he acts as the negotiator from both ends. If dispute resolution is conducted with the assistanc e of a judicial procedure, heavy amount of time and money of the parties involved is invested. Before a case reaches the court, it has through go through several stages and due to this, a case may end up conceding months and in some extreme cases it may even consume years. Alternative dispute resolution systems are much quick as compared to the judicial procedure. Secondly, in case of judicial proceedings, parties have to obtain assistance from attorney and attorneys charge heavy fees to fight a case and the more time a case takes, the higher is the amount of accumulated fees of the attorney. In case of ADR, the methods used are quite cheap as the parties can contest against each other or negotiate with each other on their own. The fourth difference between the two procedure is the difference in setting, while court proceedings are conducted in a courtroom which can become quite intimidating for the parties involved, the methods used in ADR mostly take place in one of the party†™s offices or some conference hall or room. In the case of traditional litigation system, any one of the parties involved can file a law suit and the other party may have to fight against him even if the claims made by one of the parties are not true at all (Lundmark 126). No method of ADR can be used until both the parties are not ready to solve the dispute and negotiate with ea